Sample design · This website is a demo, made to show what your business site could look like. The company, people and reviews on it are not real. · This website is a demo. The business is not real.

Built by Prebuiltwebmarket.com
Talk to the shop(720) 555-0185Book an energy audit

Boulder County, seven days a week for emergencies. Demo site with sample content.

What we install

One crew for the envelope, the mechanicals and the array, so the numbers actually add up.

See all eight solutions

Work out your own numbers

Every tool here runs in your browser on figures you can change. Nothing is emailed to us.

Open the full index

The people doing the work

Eleven people, one warehouse on Pearl Parkway, and a service radius we can drive in under an hour.

Meet the crew

Latitude 40 north

What your roof's angle is actually worth, in a table

Six pitches by six orientations, as a percentage of an unshaded 35 degree true-south plane. Pick a cell and it turns into kWh a year for your array. No salesperson required.

Rooftop solar modules at a shallow pitch on a residential roofA 4:12 south-west plane, Lafayette

The whole table, not a summary

Every pitch, every orientation, one number each

Baseline is 1480 kWh per installed kW DC per year for an unshaded optimum plane in Boulder. Sample modelled figures for this demo site.

Annual production as a percentage of an unshaded 35 degree true-south plane in Boulder (latitude 40.0 N). Sample modelled figures. Pick a cell to price it below.
Roof pitchDue south180 deg22 deg off south158 or 202Southeast / southwest135 or 22567 deg off south113 or 247Due east / west90 or 270Due north0 deg
Flat / low slope0 deg
2:129.5 deg
4:1218.4 deg
6:1226.6 deg
8:1233.7 deg
12:1245 deg

Price the plane you picked

Plane
6:12, due south
Share of optimum
100 percent
Modelled first-year energy
10,064 kWh
Against the same array due south at 35 degrees
No difference

Baseline 1480 kWh per installed kW DC per year for an unshaded optimum plane (sample). kW DC is the array's power rating; kWh is the energy it makes in a year. Shading is modelled separately.

Five things the table does not say out loud

Reading it properly

  1. 01

    Find true south before you measure anything

    Boulder's magnetic declination is about 8 degrees east, so true south reads roughly 172 degrees on a handheld compass. Eight degrees does not sound like much, and on a 6:12 roof it is worth under one percent, but it changes which of two similar planes we pick.

  2. 02

    Tilt matters less than people expect

    Between a 4:12 and an 8:12 south-facing roof there is almost nothing in it over a full year. Steeper tilts trade summer production for winter production and shed snow faster; shallower tilts do the opposite. The annual totals converge.

  3. 03

    West beats east on a time-of-use rate

    A due-west plane and a due-east plane generate a similar number of kWh, but the west plane makes its kWh in the 3 to 7 pm window where energy is worth two to three times as much. On a flat rate they are equivalent; on a time-of-use rate they are not.

  4. 04

    Split arrays are normal here

    Boulder's housing stock is full of hipped and cut-up roofs. An array across a south plane and a west plane, on separate inverter inputs, usually beats cramming everything onto the one clean face.

  5. 05

    A north plane is almost never worth it

    At 63 percent of optimum on a 6:12 pitch, a north-facing plane produces its kWh at roughly one and a half times the cost per kWh of the south plane on the same house. We quote it separately so you can say no to it.

The one that surprises people

West planes make less energy and more money

A due-west plane at 6:12 produces about 80 percent of the kWh a due-south plane would. But on a time-of-use rate, the hours it produces in are worth 23.77 cents rather than 8.36 cents. If a meaningful share of a west plane's output lands inside the 3 to 7 pm window and displaces on-peak purchases, its dollars per installed kW can beat the south plane outright.

That only holds while the rate structure holds, which is why we model it both ways and say so on the proposal rather than making a rule of it.

Due south, 6:12
100 percent of optimum
Due west, 6:12
80 percent of optimum
On-peak price, summer
$0.2377 per kWh
Off-peak price, summer
$0.0836 per kWh
Ratio
2.84 to 1

Angles and compasses

Questions about orientation

Once the angle is settled, shade is the next variable. Theshading simulator handles that one.

No. A 4:12 roof facing due east or due west produces about 84 percent of what the same roof would produce facing due south. Over a 25 year system life that difference is real but it is rarely the difference between a sensible project and a silly one. Shade matters far more.

Almost never on a pitched roof. Tilt frames add wind loading, cost, visual bulk and inter-row shading, to chase a few percent. On a genuinely flat roof, yes, we tilt, usually to 10 or 15 degrees rather than to the theoretical optimum, because row spacing eats the gain above that.

The table counts kWh. Your bill counts dollars. On a time-of-use rate the 3 to 7 pm window is priced at nearly three times off-peak, and a west plane generates into it. Same energy, more money.

Boulder's magnetic declination is about 8 degrees east, so true south sits at roughly 172 degrees on a handheld compass. We take the azimuth off the survey instrument and the site plan rather than off a phone, because phone magnetometers near a metal roof are not to be trusted.

Close, and slightly less. Boulder sits at 40 degrees north and the annual optimum for a fixed array is around 35 degrees. Latitude minus about five degrees is a decent rule, though the curve is so flat near the top that anything between 25 and 40 degrees is within a couple of percent.

Start with the test, not the quote

Three to four hours on site, a written report in five business days, and a recommendation that might well be to spend less than you planned.

Cookie preferences

Choose which cookies you allow. You can change this at any time from the link in the footer.